This is just a short throw down of some thoughts based on a discussion I had today while doing some extra work that's come my way. We were talking about international boundaries and the shape of the world map, in particular, some of the more regular or straight line boundaries. The discussion reminded me that as a youngster (and still to this day) I was absolutely fascinated by the atlas, the location of places, the assembly of boundaries and the likes. However, in thinking about the curriculum in Scotland, it would almost be possible to have a very minimalistic mapping input to Geography education, and in feedback, certainly over the last 5 years, it seems to be an element of geographical learning that students enjoy less.
I used to find this puzzling as mapping has never been so in vogue. Students on facebook will check in to locations, creating their own little footprints on maps. Some will tweet with geotagged ramblings. Many web apps have location functions. On top of that, many cars and phones will have navigation. However, this is clearly a different type of map than the ones I was brought up with. I think there is maybe less curiosity about far flung places because of the huge amount of accessible material (although recently, some of my own students challenged me on this). To ask about a place is to initiate a google search for information which may be quickly forgotten. I think students do respond to the maps which are more personal to themselves - showing friends where they are, sharing cool places, those to bodyswerve, those to be endured. However, we seem to be looking more and more at a map centred around ourselves and our own movements. We might share this
map with the world, we might even be helping to crowd source a bigger one, but effectively, it's our pin that matters. I don't claim this as a truth, just an observation and would happily be proved wrong. What do others think? Sent from my iPod
Posted via email from Mr O'D's class posterous